No results were found for your search query.
Reviews 1 - 4 of 4
-
Sarah Jessica Parker Lovely (100ml) For Her EDP
By Anonymous (25/06/2008)
- Pros: Long lasting and not overpowering
- Cons: None
This perfume is well named. It is nice and subtle and lasts a long time and not at all overpowering. I feel "Lovely" when I wear this perfume, sexy and sensual.
Read Full Review »
- Overall Rating:5 out of 5
- Quality:5 out of 5
- Value for Money:5 out of 5
- Recommend Product: Yes
-
Sarah Jessica Parker Lovely (100ml) For Her EDP
By Anonymous (16/05/2006)
- Pros: Not over powering!!
- Cons: none
This perfum is really good!! i love the smell, its lasts and is perfect for very occassion!!! Well done SJP!!! It definitly is lovely!!!
Read Full Review »
- Overall Rating:5 out of 5
- Quality:5 out of 5
- Value for Money:5 out of 5
- Recommend Product: Yes
-
Sarah Jessica Parker Lovely (100ml) For Her EDP
By Anonymous (05/05/2006)
- Pros: Dries down ok (eventually!). Long lasting.
- Cons: Overpowering lemon smell which takes a long time to fade
I tested this at a department store, and found it very strong. My wrist smelled like lemon oil for the longest time! Once the fragrance had died down, it was ok, but I wouldn't purchase. Sorry SJP.
Read Full Review »
- Overall Rating:2 out of 5
- Quality:2 out of 5
- Value for Money:3 out of 5
- Recommend Product: No
-
Sarah Jessica Parker Lovely (100ml) For Her EDP
By Anonymous (03/01/2006)
- Pros: Wonderful subtule fragrance
- Cons: None
My girlfriend set me the task of picking a perfume for her for Christmas. It certainly was a challenge and with thousands to choose from I found it a little daunting. I lurched through the perfumes department in the local store sniffing many pungent chemical concoctions and eventually stuck my beak in this delightful bottle of joy. A decision easily made in the end and on Christmas day it was un...
Read Full Review »
2 out of 2 people found this review helpful
- Overall Rating:5 out of 5
- Quality:5 out of 5
- Value for Money:5 out of 5
- Recommend Product: Yes